Grunt Forum

Go Back   Grunt Forum > Cadet Forum > General Cadet Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-18-2008, 10:17 PM
Buffa1oso1di3r's Avatar
Buffa1oso1di3r Buffa1oso1di3r is offline
Cadet Forum Moderator

Service:
Army
Status:
JROTC

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The glorious United States
Posts: 812
Default Don't ask, Don't tell

Apparently, Mr. Obama seeks to disband this policy.

Personally, I think the policy is quite stupid in the regards that it shouldn't matter what sexuality someone is, as long as they wish to protect their country.

What do you cadets think?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-19-2008, 07:50 AM
ang1sgt's Avatar
ang1sgt ang1sgt is offline
Moderator

Service:
Air Force
Status:
Retired Military

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On The Road
Posts: 374
Default

Spoken by someone who hasn't served and hasn't had to live close quarters with 50-100 people.
__________________
___________________
TOP

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-19-2008, 09:50 AM
SlightlyCatholic's Avatar
SlightlyCatholic SlightlyCatholic is offline
O-5

Service:
Navy
Status:
Naval Sea Cadet Corps

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buffa1oso1di3r View Post
Apparently, Mr. Obama seeks to disband this policy.

Personally, I think the policy is quite stupid in the regards that it shouldn't matter what sexuality someone is, as long as they wish to protect their country.

What do you cadets think?
I think only those who have BTDT will really know the advantages and disadvantages of knowing their fellow servicemembers' sexual orientation or not.
__________________
“Men of integrity, by their very existence, rekindle the belief that as a people we can live above the level of moral squalor. We need that belief; a cynical community is a corrupt community.” - John W. Gardner
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-19-2008, 09:58 AM
CAPSmith's Avatar
CAPSmith CAPSmith is offline
Cadet Forum Adult Instructor

Service:
Air Force
Status:
Auxiliary

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 363
Default

How would you be able to tell the benefits or disadvantages of working with someone who is homosexual if someone who is homosexual is unable to display any traits of being so or else they're discharged?

Wouldn't it be just like everyone being straight? No basis for comparison, right? Without people being able to be openly homosexual in the military, you will never know what the real impact is on the esprit de corps or working relationships.
__________________
CAPSmith, Maj, CAP

Help Provide College Educations for Children of Fallen Special Forces Operators
Special Operations Warrior Foundation | http://www.specialops.org/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-19-2008, 10:08 AM
SlightlyCatholic's Avatar
SlightlyCatholic SlightlyCatholic is offline
O-5

Service:
Navy
Status:
Naval Sea Cadet Corps

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAPSmith View Post
How would you be able to tell the benefits or disadvantages of working with someone who is homosexual if someone who is homosexual is unable to display any traits of being so or else they're discharged?

Wouldn't it be just like everyone being straight? No basis for comparison, right? Without people being able to be openly homosexual in the military, you will never know what the real impact is on the esprit de corps or working relationships.

What I'm talking about is the "BTDT" experience to discern IF knowing someone's orientation would be a problem. For example, I have no infantry experience but many on the forum do. What I'm wondering is for those that DO have the experience is if it would be a legitimate problem to know that your "battle buddy" might have a crush on you. I would tend to say yes because any fraternity loses its solidarity the minute that internal sexual attraction is injected into the group. However, again, I haven't BTDT.

Also, someone not announcing their homosexuality doesn't diminish the identification of said homosexuality by astute members who work with the individual on a daily basis. Not all gay people are world class actors, and many times when people come out the response isn't shocked surprise but rather, "Yeah, we kinda figured that." " I don't ask, you don't tell" doesn't always mean "I don't know".
__________________
“Men of integrity, by their very existence, rekindle the belief that as a people we can live above the level of moral squalor. We need that belief; a cynical community is a corrupt community.” - John W. Gardner

Last edited by SlightlyCatholic; 11-19-2008 at 10:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-19-2008, 10:24 AM
CAPSmith's Avatar
CAPSmith CAPSmith is offline
Cadet Forum Adult Instructor

Service:
Air Force
Status:
Auxiliary

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seminarian_Tim View Post
" I don't ask, you don't tell" doesn't always mean "I don't know".
"Not telling" doesn't just mean the person saying, "I am gay." It also includes behaviors like bringing a boyfriend to the unit's Christmas party or publicly displaying affection to members of the same sex, being married (where legal) to a member of the same sex, discussing romantic encounters, etc.

You also neglect to consider that your "battle buddy" or co-worker might be a member of the opposite sex, in which sexual attraction is more likely. Does this not diminish the solidarity of a group?

I would still argue that the knowledge of how a homosexual in a military group affects the group really isn't well known because those members are removed upon discovery. Military members in general have always been "shielded" from diversity and very resistant to change. Think of the fight to include black soldiers, women, etc. One of the arguments to women joining the military was the "distraction" that they would cause. I think General Dunwoody would disagree with that.
__________________
CAPSmith, Maj, CAP

Help Provide College Educations for Children of Fallen Special Forces Operators
Special Operations Warrior Foundation | http://www.specialops.org/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-19-2008, 10:29 AM
03_SHOOTER 03_SHOOTER is offline
Banned

Service:
Air Force
Status:
Veteran / Prior Service

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ang1sgt View Post
Spoken by someone who hasn't served and hasn't had to live close quarters with 50-100 people.
A-MEN!!

The military has the right to determine who they will and will not take, regardless if the reasons are physical or emotional, and forcing them to take openly homosexual people is as utterly insane as saying that they have to take soomeone who (if you want to make the argument that homosexuality is "natural") has any other natural disability, or who (if you want to make the argument that it's a matter of "choice") engages in any other activity as a matter of choice that it inconsistant with "Good Order and Discipline".
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-19-2008, 10:31 AM
03_SHOOTER 03_SHOOTER is offline
Banned

Service:
Air Force
Status:
Veteran / Prior Service

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAPSmith View Post
How would you be able to tell the benefits or disadvantages of working with someone who is homosexual if someone who is homosexual is unable to display any traits of being so or else they're discharged?

Wouldn't it be just like everyone being straight? No basis for comparison, right? Without people being able to be openly homosexual in the military, you will never know what the real impact is on the esprit de corps or working relationships.
Have you ever served in a unit when someone "came out"? Try THAT and tell me what happens to YOUR units morale! I can tell you what it did to mine, and it wasn't anything good, that's for certain.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-19-2008, 10:36 AM
CAPSmith's Avatar
CAPSmith CAPSmith is offline
Cadet Forum Adult Instructor

Service:
Air Force
Status:
Auxiliary

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 03_SHOOTER View Post
A-MEN!!

The military has the right to determine who they will and will not take
The citizens of the United States "We the People" have the right to determine who is or isn't eligible for military service. If "We the People" demand that homosexuals be eligible to join the military and serve openly, then the military will "just have to deal."

Of note...

Blue=Countries that allow open homosexuals
Red = Countries who ban homosexuals outright
Orange = Countries that have abiquitous policies regarding homosexuals.
__________________
CAPSmith, Maj, CAP

Help Provide College Educations for Children of Fallen Special Forces Operators
Special Operations Warrior Foundation | http://www.specialops.org/
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-19-2008, 10:49 AM
SlightlyCatholic's Avatar
SlightlyCatholic SlightlyCatholic is offline
O-5

Service:
Navy
Status:
Naval Sea Cadet Corps

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,033
Default

Quote:
I think General Dunwoody would disagree with that.
She's one end of the spectrum, the other end being an Air Force Staff Sergeant by the name of Michelle Manhart who posed for Playboy and was a very large distraction. Each group has its goods, bads, and uglies.

Quote:
You also neglect to consider that your "battle buddy" or co-worker might be a member of the opposite sex, in which sexual attraction is more likely. Does this not diminish the solidarity of a group?
...And that's exactly why most combat arms MOS's are closed to women.

Lastly, I'd trust an appointed Flag Officer with 30+ years of military experience to determine the military's stance on gays. Why would the average citizen who hasn't BTDT know better than a General Officer?
__________________
“Men of integrity, by their very existence, rekindle the belief that as a people we can live above the level of moral squalor. We need that belief; a cynical community is a corrupt community.” - John W. Gardner

Last edited by SlightlyCatholic; 11-19-2008 at 10:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.