Grunt Forum

Go Back   Grunt Forum > Cadet Forum > General Cadet Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2008, 01:19 AM
PhoenixCadet's Avatar
PhoenixCadet PhoenixCadet is offline
O-2

Service:
Air Force
Status:
Auxiliary

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 609
Send a message via AIM to PhoenixCadet
Default The Electoral College: What's your opinion?

Cadets (and anyone else),

I'm curious as to what your opinions are regarding how our presidents are elected. I'm specifically referring to the electoral college, and how we have an indirect election process.

I personally think the entire idea of the electoral college is a bad idea. I'm much, much more favorable of electing the POTUS via popular vote, because, well, that's fair. It shouldn't be left up to electors who "pledge" to vote for a certain person; especially considering they're not obligated to vote for a specific person, and can really go against the wishes of those who've elected them in.

For those who are unfamiliar on the Electoral College, you can read up on it here.

Here's their official website.

-PC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2008, 11:19 AM
MP_Girl's Avatar
MP_Girl MP_Girl is offline
E-8

Service:
Army
Status:
Veteran / Prior Service

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 230
Send a message via ICQ to MP_Girl Send a message via AIM to MP_Girl Send a message via MSN to MP_Girl Send a message via Yahoo to MP_Girl Send a message via Skype™ to MP_Girl
Default

Quite Frankly I do not like the way the electoral college gets to choose who was president. This was something I did not know of, or was not aware of until I read the website you had posted. I always thought voters voted because they were choosing the POTUS, but in all reality, the electoral college chooses. To me that is unfair. I think that they should get rid of the electoral college and just allow the people to choose.

McCain/Palin for 2008
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-11-2008, 11:59 AM
Billyd's Avatar
Billyd Billyd is offline
Cadet Forum Adult Instructor

Service:
Air Force
Status:
Retired Military

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Florida's Emerald Coast
Posts: 1,031
Default

For a lively discussion on the Electoral College, please read this thread:
http://www.gruntsmilitary.com/board/...read.php?t=402.

One thing that I pointed out there was that if the POTUS was elected via popular vote, they would really only need to campaign in NYC and LA as there are enough people in those two cities to effect the outcome. The Electoral College ensures the candidates spend time in what some have called "fly-over" country.
__________________
“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.” — Thomas Jefferson

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-11-2008, 03:08 PM
C/SSGT Seifer C/SSGT Seifer is offline
E-8

Service:
Army
Status:
JROTC

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 232
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billyd View Post
For a lively discussion on the Electoral College, please read this thread:
http://www.gruntsmilitary.com/board/...read.php?t=402.

One thing that I pointed out there was that if the POTUS was elected via popular vote, they would really only need to campaign in NYC and LA as there are enough people in those two cities to effect the outcome. The Electoral College ensures the candidates spend time in what some have called "fly-over" country.
Wow that is very interesting. I honestly don't think that the electoral college is a good idea. Voters' votes should individually affect the tally.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-11-2008, 03:39 PM
TruBlu's Avatar
TruBlu TruBlu is offline
Cadet Forum Moderator

Service:
Air Force
Status:
Delayed Entry Program

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Charleston, SC, USA
Posts: 1,450
Send a message via MSN to TruBlu
Default

I like the idea of the electoral college, it creates more of a balance between the states. As BillyD stated, candidates could campaign in places like New York, California, Texas, etc., where there are massive populations, and no where else. Of course, BOTH candidates would be doing that so they would indeed have to go to other places, but hypothetically, someone could win by controlling very small geographic portions of the US, instead of entire states. Is it entirely fair to the voters, maybe not, but neither would a lack of the college be either in my opinion.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.