Grunt Forum

Go Back   Grunt Forum > Military Forum > In the News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2008, 11:42 PM
SlightlyCatholic's Avatar
SlightlyCatholic SlightlyCatholic is offline
O-5

Service:
Navy
Status:
Naval Sea Cadet Corps

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,033
Default Executive order eases employment for military spouses

Quote:
by Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service

9/30/2008 - WASHINGTON (AFPN) -- President Bush has signed an executive order that will make it easier for spouses of servicemembers to get federal jobs.

The order authorizes noncompetitive hiring of spouses and should make the hiring process easier and faster for those in this category, said Patricia Bradshaw, deputy undersecretary of defense for civilian personnel policy.

"It shall be the policy of the United States to provide for the appropriately expedited recruitment and selection of spouses of members of the armed forces for appointment to positions in the competitive service of the federal civil service as part of the effort of the United States to recruit and retain in military service, skilled and experienced members of the armed forces and to recognize and honor the service of such members injured, disabled or killed in connection with their service," President Bush wrote in the order, issued Sept. 26.

The order will allow spouses "to walk into any personnel office of any federal agency and get a job," Ms. Bradshaw said. "This sidesteps this long-enduring process that often turns spouses away."

President Bush first proposed the initiative in his State of the Union address in January.

"We want to ensure that our military families are taken care of," Ms. Bradshaw said.

Surveys show that employment for spouses is a concern to servicemembers and their families.

To be eligible, individuals have to be the spouse of an active-duty member or of a reservist on active duty called on to relocate.

Also eligible are the spouses of servicemembers listed as 100 percent disabled and separated or retired, as well as widows or widowers of servicemembers who died on active duty, and who have not remarried.

"We hear from servicemembers that a key to retention and recruitment is the support systems in place to help family members," Ms. Bradshaw said. "More than half of the military members are married, and this is a significant issue for them."

Only about 10 percent of military spouses remain in the same place for five years, and the frequent moves make employment a problem, Ms. Bradshaw noted.

"The objective of this appointment is to actually get their foot in the door, and then they will be able to move around the federal government that much easier," she said. "This authority gets them into the door. It doesn't waive the qualifications for the job."

The director of the Office of Personnel Management will issue the implementing regulations.

"We are working with them very aggressively as quickly as possible," Ms. Bradshaw said. "Unfortunately, it will be sometime after the first of the year before we see interim regulations."
Link at: http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123117575
__________________
“Men of integrity, by their very existence, rekindle the belief that as a people we can live above the level of moral squalor. We need that belief; a cynical community is a corrupt community.” - John W. Gardner
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-01-2008, 07:49 AM
CAPSmith's Avatar
CAPSmith CAPSmith is offline
Cadet Forum Adult Instructor

Service:
Air Force
Status:
Auxiliary

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 363
Default

For some time now (at least in the AF), military spouses have had "spousal preference" when it came to jobs on base, especially in the NAF (Non-Appropriated Fund) Employee arena. The BX/PX, MWR, Services, etc have been doing this.

When I applied for a job at Langley AFB, there was about 150 applicants for the same job. I got it because I was moved to the top of the list for being a military spouse. That was almost 4 years ago now.

Personally, I'm in favor of hiring the most qualified person for the job as opposed to the person "in a special situation." Federal employees especially should get a job based on experience and personal qualifications rather than "because your married to the boss' cousin."

I will say that it is difficult for military spouses to get "normal jobs" because employers are less willing to hire someone they know will be gone in 2 years. That is a lot of training money that is wasted, so I can appreciate what this is trying to do. Don't necessarily agree with it, but can appreciate the sentiment behind it.
__________________
CAPSmith, Maj, CAP

Help Provide College Educations for Children of Fallen Special Forces Operators
Special Operations Warrior Foundation | http://www.specialops.org/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-01-2008, 01:26 PM
SlightlyCatholic's Avatar
SlightlyCatholic SlightlyCatholic is offline
O-5

Service:
Navy
Status:
Naval Sea Cadet Corps

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,033
Default

Quote:
Don't necessarily agree with it, but can appreciate the sentiment behind it.
I feel the same way. While I think that it's important to support our military families as much as possible, I'd be pretty ticked off if I found out that I was passed over for a military spouse simply because they're a military spouse.
__________________
“Men of integrity, by their very existence, rekindle the belief that as a people we can live above the level of moral squalor. We need that belief; a cynical community is a corrupt community.” - John W. Gardner
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.