PDA

View Full Version : Taliban Adopts a 'Code of Conduct'


TruBlu
07-28-2009, 11:16 AM
Taliban Adopts a 'Code of Conduct' (http://www.military.com/news/article/taliban-adopt-a-code-of-conduct.html)
July 28, 2009
Xinhua News Agency

CAIRO -- Afghanistan's Taliban pledged to limit suicide attacks in newly-issued code of conduct for its militants.

"Suicide attacks should be used only at high and important targets ... Utmost efforts should be made to avoid civilian casualties," says a book, "The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan Rules for Mujahideen," a copy of which was acquired Monday by the pan-Arab al-Jazeera TV.

The book, with 13 chapters and 67 articles, lays out rules that govern the movement fighters and differentiates between what they are allowed and not allowed to do.

While the Taliban have repeatedly resorted to suicide bombings across Afghanistan, the books talks of limiting suicide attacks, avoiding casualties among civilians and working to win the battle for the hearts of the local civilian population.

The book also forbids the formation of any new militias or armed groups and calls for disbanding any group that refuses to join the main structure of the movement.

Mullah Omar, the group leader, was quoted in the book as saying that "If unofficial groups or irregular battalions refuse to join the formal structure, they should be disbanded."

Meanwhile, the book gives the full autonomy and freedom for provincial rulers to decide operations they need to conduct and how to run the territories under their control.

The book also puts guidelines for treating the abducted foreigners and prisoners. According to the new code, the provincial leaders will be granted the right to decide the fate of the prisoners on the condition of not attacking or harming them. The code also forbids the exchange of prisoners for money.

Taliban is a fundamentalist armed pro-Qaida group. It ruled in Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001 before the U.S. invasion toppled it and brought a new regime to power.

Finally, maybe a step forward towards the ancient laws of combat and away from disregard of civilian populous and 'fringe elements.' Maybe, just maybe, this will yield a 'safer' POW and less unnecessary civilian deaths. Hopefully our efforts of winning over the civilian population will prove greater than theirs...

SlightlyCatholic
07-28-2009, 12:12 PM
I can't help but think that these new "rules" are just an attempt to throw snow on dog feces. I'll believe these changes when we get reports from ground commanders that corroborate this new "Code of Conduct".

TruBlu
07-28-2009, 12:19 PM
I can't help but think that these new "rules" are just an attempt to throw snow on dog feces. I'll believe these changes when we get reports from ground commanders that corroborate this new "Code of Conduct".

Absolutely, take everything with a grain of salt right? There probably won't be any noticeable change for a while, if ever, and the only reliable source of knowing whether or not this handbook has done anything is when the guys in the field say so. We'll see.

CAPSmith
07-28-2009, 01:10 PM
It seems to me that the Taliban leadership is attempting to reorganize itself in light of their dwindling numbers and increased offensive against their insurgencies, etc.

IF all the groups come together under that umbrella and adopt this, it brings them closer to being an organized militia, making them seem almost legitimate in their cause (to those around them).

They do have an advantage [IMO] in that those they are trying to gain control over at least practice their religion [in theory]. So, if they can give the appearance that they are trying to protect the people they wish to control from our "western zionistic armies" and minimize the damage they do to the locals, it might just help them garner some more support.

Of course, I'm not all that well versed in how they operate, but from where I sit it seems plausible. YMMV

Ben Shotalot
07-28-2009, 01:40 PM
Do you have a link to the original story? I have searched the reporting agency's website and it makes no mention of this article.

CAPSmith
07-28-2009, 02:18 PM
I found this one from Military.com: http://www.military.com/news/article/taliban-adopt-a-code-of-conduct.html

TruBlu
07-28-2009, 02:28 PM
Sorry 'bout lack of link, I embedded it in title. I usually do, slipped my mind...

Ben Shotalot
07-28-2009, 02:29 PM
I found this one from Military.com: http://www.military.com/news/article/taliban-adopt-a-code-of-conduct.html

Yea, but they are not the originators of the article. I am wondering where the original reporting is for verification purposes. There is not much in my Google searches from legit news sources. Only from forums or "regurgitating" reporting sites.

Ben Shotalot
07-28-2009, 02:33 PM
Here is what I was looking for:

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/07/20097278348124813.html

TruBlu
07-28-2009, 02:37 PM
Xinhua News Agency first published the article, according to Military.com. Is Al Jazeera who they got it from or are they the same company?

Ben Shotalot
07-28-2009, 03:09 PM
Xinhua News Agency is Chinese. Al Jazeera is ME.

Mil.com and other like sources just regurgitate news and do not create actual stories. They are really bulletin boards, therefore they are unverifiable.

Xinhua News Agency did not (as of last check) have this news story up which raised suspicions to its authenticity.

TruBlu
07-28-2009, 04:18 PM
Xinhua News Agency did not (as of last check) have this news story up which raised suspicions to its authenticity.

I couldn't find it on their website either, but Military.com said it also came out of Cairo. Typo maybe, or a multitude of such? It is odd...